Comments for OJ's rants http://rant.blackapache.net It's not about you, it's about the software Tue, 18 Nov 2008 20:14:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 Comment on .NET-fu: Signing an Unsigned Assembly (without Delay Signing) by OJ http://rant.blackapache.net/2008/07/09/net-fu-signing-an-unsigned-assembly-without-delay-signing/#comment-2532 OJ Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:10:01 +0000 http://rant.blackapache.net/?p=373#comment-2532 @Reza: That's great to hear :) I had a feeling that would be the case, and I'm happy to hear that your problem is solved. <div> </div> <div>Cheers!</div> @Reza: That’s great to hear :) I had a feeling that would be the case, and I’m happy to hear that your problem is solved.

Cheers!
]]> Comment on .NET-fu: Signing an Unsigned Assembly (without Delay Signing) by Reza http://rant.blackapache.net/2008/07/09/net-fu-signing-an-unsigned-assembly-without-delay-signing/#comment-2531 Reza Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:04:55 +0000 http://rant.blackapache.net/?p=373#comment-2531 thank you for you reply, in this period, I tested and it worked just fine :D ILDASM, beside IL code of assembly, extracts all resources which are required to rebuild the assembly. There for you simply can rebuild it using ILASM. one point about hacking references, I do it using CECIL from MONO. You can access my utility from here: http://sites.google.com/site/asyncresult/Home/hc-resign thank you for you reply,
in this period, I tested and it worked just fine :D
ILDASM, beside IL code of assembly, extracts all resources which are required to rebuild the assembly. There for you simply can rebuild it using ILASM.
one point about hacking references, I do it using CECIL from MONO.
You can access my utility from here:
http://sites.google.com/site/asyncresult/Home/hc-resign

]]> Comment on .NET-fu: Signing an Unsigned Assembly (without Delay Signing) by OJ http://rant.blackapache.net/2008/07/09/net-fu-signing-an-unsigned-assembly-without-delay-signing/#comment-2530 OJ Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:36:20 +0000 http://rant.blackapache.net/?p=373#comment-2530 @Reza: I apologise for the slow reply. I've been pretty busy lately! The short answer is: I don't know :) Perhaps you could give it a try? If I get time over the weekend I'll do a test or two and post my results. If you happen to try it before me, please let us know how it goes. My gut feeling is that it should work as expected. Good luck! @Reza: I apologise for the slow reply. I’ve been pretty busy lately!

The short answer is: I don’t know :) Perhaps you could give it a try? If I get time over the weekend I’ll do a test or two and post my results. If you happen to try it before me, please let us know how it goes.

My gut feeling is that it should work as expected.

Good luck!

]]> Comment on Does a qualification make a difference? by OJ http://rant.blackapache.net/2006/09/25/does-a-qualification-make-a-difference/#comment-2529 OJ Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:30:29 +0000 http://rant.blackapache.net/2006/09/25/does-a-qualification-make-a-difference/#comment-2529 Good morning Brian and Cleve, I'm fairly sure you will both know what I'm about to say based on your previous interaction so I'll keep it short. Please may I request that if you both feel the need to continue this conversation that you do it elsewhere? Perhaps via email or on your own blogs? This stuff is not only way off topic, but it's starting to get personal, and I really don't want that kind of interaction here. I would love you guys to continue posting thoughts on what I write, and your views on what other commenters post as well, so long as it remains on topic (or at least in the same ball-park). I have no problems with either of you guys commenting, but please don't continue down this path. It's leads nowhere. Thanks for your understanding. If I see any more responses relating to your discussions above, I will remove them. Cheers! OJ Good morning Brian and Cleve,

I’m fairly sure you will both know what I’m about to say based on your previous interaction so I’ll keep it short.

Please may I request that if you both feel the need to continue this conversation that you do it elsewhere? Perhaps via email or on your own blogs? This stuff is not only way off topic, but it’s starting to get personal, and I really don’t want that kind of interaction here.

I would love you guys to continue posting thoughts on what I write, and your views on what other commenters post as well, so long as it remains on topic (or at least in the same ball-park). I have no problems with either of you guys commenting, but please don’t continue down this path. It’s leads nowhere.

Thanks for your understanding. If I see any more responses relating to your discussions above, I will remove them.

Cheers!
OJ

]]> Comment on Does a qualification make a difference? by Brian Koontz http://rant.blackapache.net/2006/09/25/does-a-qualification-make-a-difference/#comment-2528 Brian Koontz Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:23:02 +0000 http://rant.blackapache.net/2006/09/25/does-a-qualification-make-a-difference/#comment-2528 Yes, the ironic separation of clairvoyance. This method is discredited since it's harmful to the cause the person is pursuing. You should examine it, and then if you believing continuing is the best course of action do so. Take care that Cleve Blakemore doesn't fail to save himself from Cleve Blakemore. Irony is a form of self-protection. Join the world. There's no need to worry about me "stalking" you. It would probably be better for all humans to not contact you - that way you can keep your personal air all to yourself. Colbert's roast of Chevy Chase comes to mind: "This man never forgot what got him wherever it is he thinks he is" and (name changed) "He's Cleve Blakemore, and you're not". Ooh.... stalker! Oogle oogle! Yes, the ironic separation of clairvoyance. This method is discredited since it’s harmful to the cause the person is pursuing. You should examine it, and then if you believing continuing is the best course of action do so.

Take care that Cleve Blakemore doesn’t fail to save himself from Cleve Blakemore.

Irony is a form of self-protection. Join the world.

There’s no need to worry about me “stalking” you. It would probably be better for all humans to not contact you - that way you can keep your personal air all to yourself.

Colbert’s roast of Chevy Chase comes to mind: “This man never forgot what got him wherever it is he thinks he is” and (name changed) “He’s Cleve Blakemore, and you’re not”.

Ooh…. stalker! Oogle oogle!

]]>